Concerns Arise Over Push to Recall Ellisville Council
On the tails of the council's approval of a Walmart Superstore, a group dedicated to the ouster of Ellisville City Council members who approved the project said local election calendars might block their efforts.
Efforts to recall Ellisville City Council members who helped approve a Walmart Superstore last week could be stymied by the city’s election calendar, recall organizers said Tuesday.
The Ellisville Article 9 Alliance, a group dedicated to the ouster of city council members who helped approve a Walmart Superstore, met Tuesday for the second time to organize signature collection efforts meant to initiate a recall. Those efforts come following the council’s decision last week to approve a tax increment financing district for the Walmart project as well as a relocation policy for residents at Clarkchester Apartments, which occupies part of the space designated for the store.
Despite those approvals, group organizer and Clarkchester tenant Liz Schmidt said that although the project advanced, construction of the store still isn’t guaranteed.
“So the wheels have been set in the motion,” Schmidt said. “It’s not to say this plan won’t fall apart for one reason or another, but it’s going to be more difficult to stop it.”
Schmidt said problems could arise due to zoning variances or even discoveries about the land, such as concerns related to toxic pollutants, she said. Until that time, however, the group is pushing to collect residents’ signatures that could put the question of recalling select city council members before voters.
Exactly when that could happen has yet to be determined, Schmidt said, in part because of a possible discrepancy about when a recall election can be scheduled.
A member of the St. Louis County Board of Elections said Ellisville could host a special election at any time. Schmidt said she has been unable to determine from Ellisville city staff whether a recall would need to take place on an existing election date.
Because of mandates within the city charter that specify the timeframe an official can be recalled in, Schmidt said the group has a narrow window of opportunity; the city charter says an official cannot be recalled his or her first 120 days in office, nor can they be recalled within 180 days from that official’s next election.
Because of that clause, Schmidt said, immediate efforts will be centered around Council members Dawn Anglin and Troy Pieper, who are eligible for recall currently since they were not re-elected in April. Council members Roze Acup, Matt Pirrello and Linda Reel, meanwhile, will not be eligible for recall until August.
“The procedure, if you don’t do it well, can blow up in your face,” Schmidt said. “It’s fraught with land mines.”
In order to adhere to those requirements, Schmidt said she will push for a special election on Tuesday, October 2— a date which “fell right in the middle” of the permitted recall window, she said, unlike the elections scheduled for November.
Earlier this year, City Administrator Kevin Bookout estimated that the cost of adding a recall to existing city ballots would cost the city between $500 and $1,000. Those numbers would no doubt increase for a special election, which would include expenses for printing ballots, paying election judges, tabulating votes and more.
Schmidt acknowledged that adding the recall to existing ballots would be less expensive, but said that may not be feasible because of the charter’s calendar requirements and shouldn’t deter the group’s efforts.
“It saves them some money, but excuse me, this isn’t discount democracy,” Schmidt said.
In addition to collecting signatures required to put a recall before voters, Schmidt said she will seek clarification this week from the county election board’s legal counsel regarding the city’s autonomy in setting a special election.
Editor's Note: An earlier version of this article misstated the Ellisville City Council members immediately eligible for recall.
Michael Rhodes
8:43 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Who bears the cost of this special election? Is it the taxpayers who pay for it or will A9A be the responible for the costs? Not sure why can't it be added to the November election.
Are there concerns about toxic pollutants? There are 250 people living there being exposed. Should they not be allowed into the area until it is proven safe?
K James
9:36 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Michael;
I have been told that it would cost between $12,000 and $15,000 perhaps more, to have an election out of cycle. And yes it would be the citizens of Ellisville expected to pay for that election.
Chase Castle
1:40 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Mr. Rhodes, I think the mention of unpredictable discoveries about land was somewhat hypothetical; I don't think anyone currently has reason to think that sort of the thing is the case.
As for why not adding the question to the November ballots; I believe it's concern that related to the city charter, which says no one can be recalled within 180 days of that official's next election date. A November recall vote would not be able to apply to Councilmembers Anglin and Pieper because they are up for election in April 2013 i.e. less than 180 days from the November election date.
Michael Rhodes
3:53 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Thanks Chase on the elections information. It makes sense if they are up for election soon why hold a special election.Just asked why all wouldn't be up for October and I am guessing that you can't start the signiture process before the 120 days has passed.
Was curious why ES would state that when she is fighting to keep her apartment.
Tired
2:23 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Hey Liz...Why don't you pay for the new election, since you seem to be the most interested, and the most concerned how taxpayers money is spent...Not all share your vision or enthusiasm.
K James
2:44 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Just so I understand Mr. Castle, both Council member Anglin and Pieper are up for re-election next April. But since they can't be recalled on the November Ballot because they ARE up for re-election, the Article 9 alliance, wants to hold an election in October, then again again in November and then again in April? With an off schedule election costing the city $12,000 - $15,000. If there is a special election, are those who might win an October election, have to re-run again in April?
Michael Rhodes
3:56 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Okay, I need to be educated a bit more. If a recall is approved then do others run at that same time for the spot? I thought that it was a simple retain or fire vote and then the council/mayor appointed someone to finish out the term (which would be until April) should the member be recalled.
Chase Castle
4:02 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Short of wholesale changes to the city charter, it is my humble understanding that Ellisville residents will be going to the polls (or have the chance to) in November and April regardless of any possible recall action. I cannot confirm those cost numbers but will let you know when we do.
K James
11:48 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Chase, I didn't think you had a humble bone...Just kidding... Of course there will be elections in Nov and April, One will be a presidential election in Nov, the other will be the regularily scheduled April election, no opinion necessary. I did ask someone in the city what an out of cycle election would cost the city taxpayers, 12-15 thousand dollars. As far as "wholesale" changes to the city's charter, Not gonna happen. The current city charter was worked on for a very long time before it was voted on. If changes to the city charter are required, I am positive that there would be many hearings before a change could be made and quite possibly a vote of the citizens also at a regularly scheduled election.
E. Schmidt
6:59 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
No changes to the city charter needed. It provides for special elections here:
Section 8.1. CITY ELECTIONS.
(b) SPECIAL ELECTIONS. The Council may by ordinance
order special elections, fix the time for such elections, and provide
for holding such elections.
It clearly states the City Council has the authority to set a special election.
Chase Castle
8:46 am on Friday, May 11, 2012
K James. You are correct. And yes, changes to the charter require voter approval. But please try not to read into that theoretical possibility, which I think is getting people off topic.
Maybe I didn't understand your original (rhetorical?) question. A special election would indeed be an additional election in the city's cycles. I wouldn't say anyone "wins." I encourage you to investigate the process for filling recalled officials.
E. Schmidt
6:21 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
This is not discount democracy.
And thus is certainly not "Wal-Mart style" discount democracy.
This is the cost of having a City Charter that allows for direct democracy. The bill has come due. They need to pay it instead of feigning poverty.
Ellisville residents taxed themselves an addition one-half cent sales tax in April 2011 to stop then Mayor Pirrellos’s talk of needing a Wal-Mart TIF. There should be plenty of money sloshing around to let the voters’ voices be heard.
And let’s remember that just over two months later, after Ellisville voters agree to tax themselves to prevent a Sansone Walmart TIF on 04-07-11, the City Council approved this on 06-15-11:
“A Resolution Authorizing a Preliminary Funding Agreement with Sansone Group in Connection with a Proposed Tax Increment Financing Project and Authorizing Certain Actions Connected Therewith.”
Think about that a minute.--Just a little over two months later, the City Council did exactly the opposite of what the voters wanted.
So now the city is providing free financing to Sansone for a Walmart TIF in the MILLIONS.
The apparent duplicity is just STUNNING.
So, I think there is plenty of money for a special election.
Let’s use some of that new half-cent sales tax money and apply it the cost of a special election to get our voices heard this time, since it didn’t work at all the first time when we said "No Walmart TIF" at the April 2011 sales tax election.
K James
7:41 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Liz;
<Ellisville residents taxed themselves an addition one-half cent sales tax in April 2011 to stop then Mayor Pirrellos’s talk of needing a Wal-Mart TIF?>
I would really like to know where this statement came from. Since the debate about Tif's came up long after the 1/2 cent sales tax was passed. Walmart TIF wasn't even in the picture to my knowledge before that election cycle. You have noted this statement several times, and I can't find supporting facts for this. I am not questioning your integrity here, just trying to figure out your timeline.
As far as monies "sloshing" around, Ellisville simply isn't run that way. The budget has been cut and cut and cut for the past several years. You would have rather more services cut, so you can have a special election when one of the 2 members you are trying to recall cannot even be re-elected in April? I understand your passion. With the exception of your objection to the TIF issue, Both Dawn and Troy have been outstanding members on this council. They are both extremely independent and fair minded on issues regarding their custodianship of their districts. Until I was redistricted into District 3 a few months ago, Dawn was my councilmember and she was truly a pleasure to work with. So, since you disagree with her on this issue, she should be thrown out? Without your re-call she would be out in 5 months anyway due to term limits.
E. Schmidt
8:30 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Kate--
You wrote:
>>>I would really like to know where this statement came from. Since the debate about Tif's came up long after the 1/2 cent sales tax was passed. Walmart TIF wasn't even in the picture to my knowledge before that election cycle. You have noted this statement several times, and I can't find supporting facts for this. I am not questioning your integrity here, just trying to figure out your timeline.<<<
Notice the date on the article excerpt I provided below....November 13, 2010.
>>>I would really like to know where this statement came from. Since the debate about Tif's came up long after the 1/2 cent sales tax was passed.<<<<
From 04-05-11 [Sales Tax Election] to 06-15-11 [Resolution Authorizing Preliminary Fund for the TIF] is NOT a long after at all by any stretch of the imagination.
It is exactly 61, count 'em, 61 days.
(Excuse the election date error on the above post.)
If you really think that the TIF controversy wasn't in the picture until 2012, you have a lot to learn about how this debacle went down.
E. Schmidt
8:07 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
K Jamies
<Ellisville residents taxed themselves an addition one-half cent sales tax in April 2011 to stop then Mayor Pirrellos’s talk of needing a Wal-Mart TIF?>
http://ballwin-ellisville.patch.com/articles/weighing-in-on-walmart
Weighing in on Walmart
Ellisville residents share concerns about traffic, atmosphere tied to mega-store's possible arrival. By Chase Castle November 13, 2010
>>>Roughly three-fourths of Ellisville residents who were informally polled recently said they opposed a Walmart coming to Ellisville, although Mayor Matt Pirrello and others suggest it may be best alternative to a sales tax increase.
Pirrello said at a town hall meeting this week that a key factor in whether a tax hike will be necessary is how much revenue can be generated through the county sales tax, which gives a majority of its revenues to local municipalities. The debate comes as the city prepares its 2011 budget, which has a shrinking margin between revenues and expenses that Pirrello said needs attention...<<<
Aside for Chase Castle's spot on reporting as to what was said and the sentiment of the crowd, I know people who were at that meeting. They took notes.
There it is.
E. Schmidt
8:43 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Chase,
Could we get a Comments Section with an edit and preview functions?
Sometimes I can't $pell. I getz cornfused.
Pleeze halp us!
K James
9:41 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Liz;
<Ellisville residents taxed themselves an addition one-half cent sales tax in April 2011 to stop then Mayor Pirrellos’s talk of needing a Wal-Mart TIF>
<Roughly three-fourths of Ellisville residents who were informally polled recently said they opposed a Walmart coming to Ellisville, although Mayor Matt Pirrello and others suggest it may be best alternative to a sales tax increase>
I can't see where he stated every anything about a TIF? Did I miss something, all I saw in the article was talking about a 'possible' deal with walmart, no mention of TIF.
I don't want to split hairs here, but a Mayor talking about a general idea for a private developer with a Walmart in mind, is a whole lot different than a Mayor talking about a tax increase in lieu of using a TIF.
Not arguing to your point, just trying to clarify.
K James
9:42 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
And I agree, spell check or preview would be a nice touch Mr. Castle!!!!!
E. Schmidt
10:16 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
K James--
You wrote--
>>>I can't see where he stated every anything about a TIF? Did I miss something, all I saw in the article was talking about a 'possible' deal with walmart, no mention of TIF. <<<
it is my understanding that nearly very developer who has approached the City of Ellisville recently regarding re-development of the corner of Manchester and Clarkson Rds. has stated they needed TIF build a Wal-Mar or a Target or whatever. This fact has been stated in public and in public meetings on more than one occasion. The developers came in feigning poverty...(and we know they needed Eminent Domain to assemble the property parcels.)
I think you do want to split hairs.
This woman got the point. It was more than clear to her....and others who took notes.
>>>...Residents such as Kim Rudd, however, said she would rather see the city adopt a sales tax rather than live near a retail giant.
"It's really not that big of a deal," Rudd, 28, said of a sales tax increase. "I mean, am I not going to buy something because it costs a half-percent more? Probably not."...<<<
She understood what she was voting for and why on 04-05-11...and so did many, many many of the other 64% of the voters who voted "Yes."
K James
11:11 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Liz;
I do rely on you for a lot of the history for the sales tax increase from last year, I had started a new job and was traveling most of 2011, So I don't know the details.
Tired
1:06 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Walmart is coming.......................................
K James
1:28 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Tired - are you stirring the pot????
E. Schmidt
6:56 am on Friday, May 11, 2012
I wrote--
>>>No changes to the city charter needed. It provides for special elections here:
Section 8.1. CITY ELECTIONS.
(b) SPECIAL ELECTIONS. The Council may by ordinance
order special elections, fix the time for such elections, and provide
for holding such elections.
It clearly states the City Council has the authority to set a special election.<<<
I forgot to add that I spoke with the legal counsel for the St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners who assured me that if the Ellisville City Charter allows for special election for a municipal issue, [as it does] the CC could call for a special election municipal purposes outside of the established schedule. The County does not dictate what kind of and/or when a municipality can call a special election for a municipal purpose.
Michael Rhodes
10:13 am on Friday, May 11, 2012
ES: What is the expected cost for the Special Election?
E. Schmidt
6:27 am on Saturday, May 12, 2012
The cost of a recall election is determined by the City.
Michael Rhodes
9:05 pm on Saturday, May 12, 2012
Thought the county provided the estimate based on the number of registered voters amd what it would take to hold the elecetion. When do you expect to know the estimated cost?
K James
7:35 am on Saturday, May 12, 2012
Well no it is not E, the county election board will have to supply the voting equip, workers etc, then they charge the city. I was wrong in my estimate of $12,000-15,000. That is the cost to the city to add an issue to the scheduled November ballot. So, it would be reasonable to assume that the cost to the city do do it off of a scheduled time that it would cost the city significantly more.
E. Schmidt
7:54 am on Saturday, May 12, 2012
K James
Whether or not a municipal initiative, referendum or recall election is a shared election with St. Louis County or a special municipal election called by the city for its own purposes, the City estimates and provides info on the cost.
How the City arrives at that estimate and where it gets the info is a different question.
Perhaps you should read the City Charter.
K James
5:36 pm on Saturday, May 12, 2012
Liz
I don't need to read the charter to make a call to the city and ask what the cost to the city to either add an issue to the November ballot or the spring ballot, or hold a separate election free standing. Public information and easy to ascertain. The cost is still the cost. The county charges the city for equipment used, it is what it is. Adding to the county ballot in November will cost the city $12,000 - $15,000 (I am thinking this is because it is a national ballot). To add to the April ballot is $500-$1000 and to hold a special election I can only speculate as to the cost because we haven't done it before. But since merely adding to a national ballot in November is very expensive, I am making an educated guess that it would be significantly more cost than adding to a ballot measure.
E. Schmidt
7:28 am on Sunday, May 13, 2012
K James wrote-
>>>I was wrong in my estimate of $12,000-15,000.<<<
Yes. You are likely wrong. ..if for no other reason than you are ballparking it and there’s this thing called inflation at work.
>>>To add to the April ballot is $500-$1000 and to hold a special election I can only speculate as to the cost because we haven't done it before. But since merely adding to a national ballot in November is very expensive, I am making an educated guess that it would be significantly more cost than adding to a ballot measure."<<<
I don’t know nor do I pretend to know. The cost is a matter of law…and not something to be ballparked or guessed at based on prior situations that don’t necessarily apply.
The cost either needs to be precise or at the very least an official estimate. The City can do that. The City consults with the County. It is up to the City to provide the info. You would know this if you could be bothered to read the City Charter.
I don’t and won’t deal in misinformation if I can avoid it. If on occasion it happens , it is inadvertent on my part. I always do my homework as best I can. Always. [Sound familiar?]
And I don’t go off half-cocked. When I go off I am fully cocked, locked and loaded.
K James
8:11 am on Sunday, May 13, 2012
Liz, please dont take my statements out of context. I did consult with the city, and those ARE their estimates, i honestly dont understand why we are bickering over this. According to the city, these are the Numbers:
1. Adding to the November ballot will cost the city anywhere from $12,000-$15,000
2. Adding to the April ballot will cost $500-$1000
3.Adding another entire independent unscheduled election No estimate because it hasn't been done before.
This information comes directly from the city. I don't have any clues why you keep refering to my understanding of the city's charter when I am just referring to the cost of an election. Michael Rhodes asked the question, i looked for an answer, that is all, I Dont understand why you keep referring to the charter when i am only speaking to the cost of an election Liz. Mr. Rhodes asked, I asked the city. Ellisville Charter not in this conversation.
E. Schmidt
8:46 am on Sunday, May 13, 2012
K James--
You wrote--
>>>I don't have any clues why you keep refering to my understanding of the city's charter when I am just referring to the cost of an election.<<<
Yes,. I know you don't have a clue.
Section 9.3. PETITIONS.
(c) AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR. Each paper of a petition
shall have attached to it when filed an affidavit executed by the
circulator thereof stating the following:…(blah, blah, blah.) Such affidavit shall also state the approximate cost of the election.
[end paragraph]
An affidavit is a legal document. The approximate cost is provided by the City to be stated on the document.
The approximate cost is not something to be ballparked or guessed or broadcast by heresay by someone who talked to somebody else on the phone.
When it comes out in writing to be placed on a petition, then we'll know for certain.
K James
12:01 pm on Sunday, May 13, 2012
Liz;
Again with the personal attacks. Michael Rhodes asked a question, I went to the city, and got a general answer. Please stop calling me names, I continue to not attack you personally, yet in almost all of your responses you strive to demean me personally with the name calling. I do not do this to you, for I find it extremely uncalled for. The politics of personal destruction is not a practice that is helpful ever.
E. Schmidt
7:31 am on Monday, May 14, 2012
K James –
What name calling?
You admitted:
>>>Well no it is not E, the county election board will have to supply the voting equip, workers etc, then they charge the city. I was wrong in my estimate of $12,000-15,000.<<<
>>>Michael Rhodes asked a question, I went to the city, and got a general answer.<<<
Yes. Which was wrong.
And;
>>> I don't have any clues why you keep refering to my understanding of the city's charter…<<<
Elections for initiative, referendum and recall and their approximate costs are a matter of legal public record because they eventually appear on affidavits (which are legal documents ) AS STATED ARTICLE 9 of the CITY CHARTER.
The costs of adding recall elections or initiative ballot items is indeterminate at best at this point in time.
[ Hint: “I don’t know,” is an acceptable answer. So is, "The cost of a recall election is determined by the City." ]
cont'd
E. Schmidt
7:36 am on Monday, May 14, 2012
cont'd
I know that some people who frequent this comments section think this give and take on the Patch is about being witty and cute or pretending they are in the know because they made a phone call, served on a commission or served in office at one time.
I also know that this Sansone Walmart TIF is wrecking havoc with peoples’ lives including working single parents with custody issues, handicapped and other school children who will have to change schools, elderly and disabled people who are looking at five year waiting lists for subsidized housing because they could lose the perfectly decent, affordable housing they have right NOW …not to mention the potential loss of three small businesses and the decline in property values for those property owners to the south and west of this proposed project, the degradation of Whippoorwhill Park and Trail, etc…
I don’t have time for gadflies or dilettantes who won’t do a simple web search and/or read a document. This isn’t about BBQ. This is about the law, people’s lives and MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars.
It has never been easier to do this kind of research. No one need go to City Hall, the Public Library or even a law library for hours on end. Public documents and references are online…statutes, codes, charters, schedules etc…
Anyone can sit in front of their computer in their jammies with a cup of coffee and find the info if they bother...if they bother at all.
K James
9:22 am on Monday, May 14, 2012
Liz
You say 'I dont have time for gadflies etc, yet you spend an awdul lot of time spatting at me. Still with the name calling? It gets old Liz, The politics of personal destruction. Truly not helpful. I am deeply sorry that you are going to have to move, it is sad. And i say this even after continued jabs at me. I dont know your life experiences and you dont know mine, so please stop with the personal jabs at me. Not productive. I understand you dont want to move, but name calling isn't advancing anything.
As afar as the rest of your above comments.. You have your way of processing info and i have mine.
Tired
9:38 am on Monday, May 14, 2012
BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP...BEEP..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
K James
10:17 am on Monday, May 14, 2012
Tired still stirring the pot
MIKE K
12:17 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012
I would have hated to lose our fine police force. Thank God the Walmart initiative passed.
E. Schmidt
1:50 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012
mike k--
There was never a threat to losing the police force. It was a scare tactic.
Read the city budget lately? Or even the budget summary? It’s on line…for all to see…if they bother.
Hey, did your lawyer son earning the six-figure income ever step-up and help defend his fellow Missouri Walmart employees who got their wages stolen to the tune of 90 MILLION?
>>> My youngest son worked part time at the walmart in chesterfield valley to save enough money for college. He went to st louis univ and then on to univ of chicago law school.<<<
Did he get ripped-off too? Did they make him work through his lunch and rest breaks…and even more hours?
Did he get part of the settlement the Missouri judge forced Walmart to pay back when they got caught red-handed stealing from their employees by their own internal security systems? It was a state-wide case, systematic theft and it went on for years.
Was he even aware he was getting his wages stolen?
You never did answer my questions about that.
K James
2:41 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012
Liz;
<There was never a threat to losing the police force. It was a scare tactic.> So now who is speculating, you don't have any clue as to what cuts would have to be made.
E. Schmidt
9:55 am on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
mike k
I understand if you don't want to answer the questions regarding you son. Some people are embarrassed when they or someone they love is a victim of a criminal-like behavior.
Walmart stole 90M in wages from Missouri employees and had to pay it back in 2009 when they got caught red-handed by their own internal security systems.
This is not merely a payroll mistake by “Harriet in Accounting”…this is pattern of illegal behavior…some would say criminal behavior.
There must be real big money to be made in jerking around the little guy, because Walmart keeps doing it Keeps stealing from their own employees--getting sued, fighting creation of the class, losing the cases and appealing the verdicts (in other states where the judges are pushovers)…or settling.
In Washington State where Walmart was forced to settle, the judge demanded that the cash registers automatically lock out the employees if they haven’t taken their rest or lunch break since Walmart can’t be trusted. It’s like putting an ankle-bracelet on a parolee or requiring an alcoholic to have an ignition breathalyzer.
cont'd
E. Schmidt
9:57 am on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
cont'd
If someone intimidate you and stole $90 from your wallet, you’d be screaming for the police to make an arrest and the prosecutor to file charges.
In MO, Walmart stole $90M in wages. Funny how good citizens would never buy from a drug dealer or a stolen goods from a fence, but will actually “pay” to have white collar thieves to do business in their community.
Again, Walmart 90M stole from people like yourself…your son...and is still stealing from employees in other states…millions and millions of dollars.
That was a lot of injustice heaped on my fellow Missourians…and continues to be heaped on my fellow Americans so consumers can buy a $2 bath towel and a $3 waffle iron at a Thanksgiving Door Buster sale and get trampled in the process.
And they want Ellisville taxpayers to subsidize it and make the playing field even more uneven? Not on my dime.
Yet ,I hear people say, “Walmart is a great American company.” So, this is how we now define a great company?—A thieving, lying corporation with a pattern of criminal-like behavior?
If Walmart were an individual rather than a corporation who stole 90M, they’d be doing time in the state penitentiary.
If you stole $900 from a Walmart cash register, you’d be in the county jail.
But, instead Walmart of being criticized for their lying and thieving, they are being a lauded and even “welcomed” by some in Ellisville including yourself.
cont'd
E. Schmidt
9:59 am on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
cont'd
I have a positive solution. Why don’t we tell a corporation that steal from its’ own employees to find somewhere else to do business –since theft is not a community standard we support in Ellisville.
mike k – You wrote:
>>> Walmart in Ellisville will be the best thing that has ever happened to this city.<<<
I hope you change your mind about what a great thing this would be…but, I know victims sometimes identify with their captors.
MIKE K
5:42 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
In answer to your question, my son neither asked for or received any settlement from Walmart due to his years working there. Unlike some union employees, he was not a clock watcher and was willing to do whatever it took to take care of his customer even if it meant working part of his lunch or afternoon break.
He especially enjoyed waiting on Kurt Warner mutliple times during Kurt's stay in St. Louis when he playing for the Rams.
E. Schmidt
7:49 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
mike k
So then he was the perfect Wal-Mart slave and worked for free when they demanded it. Good for him.
But, I imagine it was hard to save money for college like that.
Most everyone works to make a living or earn money.
CSloan
1:45 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
First I should say that Walmart's business practices are somewhat unimportant since the Supercenter seems inevitable. I'm not sure how anyone could be excited about getting them as a neighbor and defending them as an employer confuses me even more, but my opinion isn't the one winning out here.
That said, mike k, it's odd that you'd mention unions, which Walmart actively prohibits and discourages. Your son is not an attorney now *because* he worked at Walmart, and I don't think we need to review the reasons why he chose not to make a career there. It's offensive that you would refer to people who expect to be PAID for time they are WORKING as "clock watchers". Believe it or not, some people have to try to live on hourly wages, and Walmart is practically famous for paying less than a liveable wage. Given that most attorneys bill by the hour, I imagine your son watches the clock a bit these days.
Michael Rhodes
2:44 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
What do you consider a "livable wage"?
E. Schmidt
3:09 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
CSloan--
You may find this interesting. There is human trafficking and actual slaves in the Wal-Mart supply chain.
See:
http://sumofus.org/campaigns/shrimp/?sub=ufcw
Earlier this month, in a factory in Thailand that processes shrimp for a major supplier to Walmart there was a revolt.2,000 guest workers from Cambodia and Myanmar angrily protested the seizure of their passports by factory owners in Thailand. Police were called. Shots were fired.
But it wasn’t just the passport seizure that incited the workers’ anger — it was management slashing wages again. Their wages already didn’t cover the most basic needs, and this action put workers deeper into the factory’s debt — it’s called debt bondage. At this moment, many of them are still legally and financially trapped at the factory, victims of human trafficking.
Sign our petition to Walmart’s VP of Ethical Sourcing Rajan Kamalanathan to demand these factory owners end human trafficking immediately and allow independent monitors to audit all of their factories.
This is not an isolated incident. Also in Thailand, a pineapple factory had similar protests over wage reductions. There are now reports of human trafficking and that children under 15 have been bought and sold to work there. More than 73% of this factory’s shipments to the USA go to Walmart.
CSloan
3:46 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
That's striking, E Schmidt. Too bad we can't recognize it for bondage here. Such a large percentage of Walmart employees qualify for public assistance, you'd think more taxpayers would be upset about subsidizing WMart's low wages, botched or blocked overtime, and appalling worker's comp practices (to the tune of tens of millions every year).
I wish any of it mattered right now for Ellisville.
Michael Rhodes
3:58 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
ES: using your logic you need add the following companies and any other business that sells any of these products:
Nike, Apple, Target, Sears (Kmart), Whole Foods, PF Changs, Costco, McDonalds, Disney, Coca Cola, Nestle, Mars, Hershey, Ikea, and the list goes on and on.
E. Schmidt
1:19 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012
Hey CSloan,
Here's an actual case of forced labor by a Wal-Mart supplier in the U.S>
http://www.change.org/petitions/walmart-stop-profiting-from-forced-labor-in-louisiana
>>>...Walmart says it doesn't allow forced labor by any of its suppliers. But Walmart is profiting from the forced labor we lived through right here in Louisiana. And now they're trying to cover up what happened to us -- while refusing even to speak with us.
Walmart needs to meet with us immediately, and to show its suppliers that it won't tolerate forced labor. We’re demanding that Walmart:...<<<
Sign and forward to people who care that others are treated decently.
CSloan
3:03 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Michael Rhodes, "livable wage" or "living wage" is a widely used policy term that generally hovers around the poverty line. It describes the bare minimum needed to pay for required necessary living expenses like food and shelter. Obviously it differs according to the area where one lives, but I'm not talking about paying for cable.
Michael Rhodes
3:47 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
It is a subjective term was just curious, as you stated Walmart pays less than a livable or living wage, what those wages are?
CSloan
3:58 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
It's really only subjective in that it costs more to pay for the basics in New York than in, say, Moberly. It's not my term, and while I'm guessing you have an anecdote about a lady on welfare driving a Cadillac, I'm not really interested in discussing what is basic.
You're free to look up the 2012 Poverty guidelines here:
http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/12poverty.shtml
Or check out this living wage calculator here:
http://www.livingwage.geog.psu.edu/
Michael Rhodes
7:20 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
No, no andecdote (although I am sure there are plenty). By looking at the link you provided the poverty level is about $12k/yr. That works out to about $5.77/hr for a fulltime employee. I think Missouri minimum wage is just over $7/hr. I was also under the impression Walmart paid more that the minimum wage so I am trying to understand how you think they pay less. You must have a thought of what is a livable wage and I was curious as to what that amount was.
CSloan
9:16 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Well Parsey McBaiter, given how fixated you are on the word livable (again, NOT my word) and presume to know what it is I'm thinking, I'll try this one more time. Good math work there--a perfect 40 hours at the minimum wage would keep someone living *alone* rolling the high life just above the poverty level. No one who works at Walmart is allowed to have a dependent I suppose, and let's hope you get all your hours (that they don't do something like keep you just under their threshold for offering health insurance, for instance). If you really think Walmart became the company they are just by mastering logistics and supply chain, go right ahead and do so. Sam Walton himself was extremely candid that the model worked because the people were cheap.
And sure, I'll throw you a bone: Would I personally want to live on Walmart wages? I'm not even remotely that brave, no.
Michael Rhodes
10:30 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I do not what Parsey McBaiter means?
You wrote "Walmart is practically famous for paying less than a liveable wage".
I simply asked what you thought a liveable wage was? I took the information from the link you provided an an example. Sure, Walmart employees can have dependants. That is most peoples choice. Are you suggesting Walmart (or an employer) should set wages based on the number of dependants?
I personally think about $20k/yr for single person would be a livable wage. Not going to own a home or drive a nice car on that. It will pay the rent and put food on the table.
K James
10:25 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Sorry guys, my impression of Walmart and ALLRetail in general, is not that they pay a living wage, they pay a wage a high schooler /college student needs, retail is a first job, not a destination. All retail pays garbage, it is the nature of the beast. Yes wallyworld is the worst of them all because they hire more people cuz they are so big, but you can ask my ex what XXX pays their employees and the time demands of a "40" hour week working 60 and being paid for 40. If walmart is your 'destination' job. For goodness sakes AIM HIGHER.
Michael Rhodes
10:35 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I would agree. Retail (unless you stay with it into management) always was what you did until you started your career. Be it after college, tech school, or getting on at a factory etc...
MIKE K
10:27 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
average salary for a Walmart sales associate is $10.76 hr plus an opportunity for an annual $1,800 bonus. Not counting overtime, that's over $24,000 annually. Not my cup of tea but not bad for a spouse in a 2 income family or a kid saving money for college.
E. Schmidt
6:58 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
mike k
>>>Not counting overtime,<<<
Yeah...not counting overtime...since Wal-Mart expects you to work for free...which was the point of the 90 MILLION dollar law suit and settlement in Missouri.
Wal-Mart employees are still putting in overtime for free in other states. The Missouri judge was exceptionally tough and for the first time forced Wal-Mart to open their own internal security devices for the court record,
In other words the judge said "Show Me."
E. Schmidt
7:25 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
C Sloan,
Thanks for engaging in the conversation.
You will find (if you already haven't) that participants fail to do simple web searches for basic info. They want to be spoonfed. They are either obtuse, gadflies and dilettantes. The are also so obtuse that they think the terms "gadfly" and "dilettante" is name calling.
In a serious debate about serious matters they are far out of their league.
E. Schmidt
7:38 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Michael Rhodes--
You wrote-
>>>ES: using your logic you need add the following companies and any other business that sells any of these products:
Nike, Apple, Target, Sears (Kmart), Whole Foods, PF Changs, Costco, McDonalds, Disney, Coca Cola, Nestle, Mars, Hershey, Ikea, and the list goes on and on.<<<
At one of the Chinese Apple suppliers, the workers were hurling themselves out of windows and off the top of the roofs to commit suicide. They were locked in the factory for months on end. The factory owner solved the problem by placing bars on the windows and exterior netting around the building. Do a simple google search.
Prior to 2008 or so, those components and finished i-phones and i-pods were made in the U.S. I don't buy i-junk anymore as a result. I won't work on Job's farm no more.
I am careful about what I buy based on the sourcing.
When there is an i-boycott app for the i-phone, i-will buy one...and laugh about the irony all the way to the cash register where i-don't spend money on junk that makes the people who made it want to kill themselves.
E. Schmidt
7:50 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
edit--
The above should have read:
...i-ain't gonna work on Steve Job's farm no more...
i-don't want angry replies from the Dylan fans out there.
E. Schmidt
8:14 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
i-haven't been paying attention like should.
There is a boycott app of sorts...
http://www.prlog.org/11773101-first-ever-boycott-app-for-android-and-iphone-puts-purchasing-power-in-consumers-hands.html
No i-junk needed. You can use Android.
Michael Rhodes
9:14 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I have neither an I-phone or an Android device. Guess I am behind the times.
K James
7:40 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Liz
The problem some of us have with your point is that we work many more than 40 hours a week without the expectation of overtime compensation. Walmart (retail) is a job, not a destination. Again. Retail stinks. Aim higher!
E. Schmidt
7:57 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
>>>The problem some of us have with your point is that we work many more than 40 hours a week without the expectation of overtime compensation.<<<
The problem I have is with people who don't understand basic labor law and the difference between a hourly wage earner and a salaried worker. Do a google search.
Michael Rhodes
8:31 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Recent lawsuits have found that a salaried workers may also be entitled to overtime pay under certain circumstances. There have been cases of companies exploiting the salaried worker to avoid payng overtime.
CSloan
8:23 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Michael Rhodes said:
"I simply asked what you thought a liveable wage was?"
Yes, and you're trying to uncover something that isn't there to uncover. If you go way, way back to the point at which you started helping me pull this completely off topic, I was responding to mike k's comment on E Schmidt's question about Walmart's storied history of screwing their employees out of their already meager wages. I'd ask you to agree that a Walmart employee doesn't have a lot of wiggle room when it comes to giving up pay, but that's probably asking too much. I find it telling that you've worked so hard to make the numbers match your story--that these are decent jobs capable of supporting people--yet you were so quick to agree with K James that they're jobs better suited for kids. Guess what? We agree! However, I don't know where you guys shop, but when I look around kids are not what I see. Once upon a time we made things here, but since we don't any longer people have to work where they can find work. Massive retail is the new manufacturing.
"Are you suggesting Walmart (or an employer) should set wages based on the number of dependants?"
I'm sorry, where did I say that? Walmart can operate in whatever way it chooses. I just prefer not to see people who depend on jobs there--and have the nerve to expect wages for time worked--derided as "clock watchers".
(cont)
CSloan
8:26 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
mike k, I don't put a lot of stock in "average hourly pay" for a company the size of Walmart. While your scenario sounds dreamy, let's not pretend that the large majority of Walmart employees don't live at or close to poverty. The fact that such a large percentage of them qualify for public assistance tells us otherwise.
K James wrote:
" If walmart is your 'destination' job. For goodness sakes AIM HIGHER."
...as a fun experiment, why don't you try saying that to the first few middle aged employees you greet in the new store? All these blasted poor people--they're just not doing it right.
Michael Rhodes
9:12 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
CSloan: What is the percentage of Walmart employees receiving public assistance compared to Target and Kmart? Eveything I could locate indicated they were in line with each other. The one good example I found was 1 in 4 (25%) children of Walmart employees received public health coverage in Georgia. The study did not indicate the average family size.
I think the point KLames is making is that it use to be working retail/grocery/fast food was not something done to support a family or as a career. That has changed as more and more people are choosing to work these types of jobs (either out a neccesity or lack of drive to find a traditional career). In the end that Walmart, Target, Kmart, etc employee is choosing to work where they do. Now, would it be nice if all jobs paid enough for a family to live comfortably (not rich, but able to have a home, plenty of food, health care)? You bet. When that happens though it will be industry wide and will in turn lead to higher cost for products/services pushing some of those earners right back below the poverty line again.
CSloan
9:30 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
At no point was I holding up Kmart or Target as superior employers. Minimum wage is minimum wage. The topic is Walmart, and they just happen to be the nation's largest employer.
As far as the link between Walmart and public assistance, I think of this study done in California. Keep in mind these numbers are for California alone:
http://www.dsausa.org/lowwage/walmart/2004/walmart%20study.html
Main Findings:
Reliance by Wal-Mart workers on public assistance programs in California comes at a cost to the taxpayers of an estimated $86 million annually; this is comprised of $32 million in health related expenses and $54 million in other assistance.
The families of Wal-Mart employees in California utilize an estimated 40 percent more in taxpayer-funded health care than the average for families of all large retail employees.
The families of Wal-Mart employees use an estimated 38 percent more in other (non-health care) public assistance programs (such as food stamps, Earned Income Tax Credit, subsidized school lunches, and subsidized housing) than the average for families of all large retail employees.
If other large California retailers adopted Wal-Mart’s wage and benefits standards, it would cost taxpayers an additional $410 million a year in public assistance to employees.
>>2004 isn't terribly recent, so feel free to point me in the direction of something more current stating that things have improved dramatically.
E. Schmidt
8:46 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Michael Rhodes--
Your wrote:
>>>There have been cases of companies exploiting the salaried worker to avoid payng overtime.<<<
Yep. That's quite a tactic. The re-definition from hourly to salaried worker is hard to fight in court.
Some workers don't even realize they've been... well, let's just say "jerked." They actually think they got "promoted" when they get re-defined as a "salary employee."
Michael Rhodes
9:45 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I have been both houry and salaried. I do perfer salaried most of the time. There are those days or weeks where I am working from 7AM to 3Pm only to drive home and pop back on the computer at 7PM to 11PM to finish things up. So wishing I got overtime on those days. The flip side is that on Friday when I run errands or volunteer at my daughters school for an hour or two I don't have to take vacation time.
E. Schmidt
11:16 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
C Sloan--
You wrote:--
>>>At no point was I holding up Kmart or Target as superior employers.<<<
Both corporations get sued far less by employees over wages and hours That's a bonus in my book.
As I've said before, if Ellisville could only get some combined federal and state grant to build a Central Wal-Mart Courthouse for all the lawsuits to be heard, we residents and our merchants would be rolling in dough...and the hundreds of suits could stop clogging up state court systems and clear the federal dockets.
CSloan
11:35 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
E Schmidt wrote:
"Both corporations get sued far less by employees over wages and hours That's a bonus in my book."
Quite true. More impressive still given what is required of companies to compete with them successfully. Even though I think they're responsible for a fairly major shift in standards, there is something to be said for other major retailers who refuse to stoop to the lowest, lawsuit-worthy practices.
Mike K
6:24 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I'd like to get back on topic. How do I find out more about this recall effort?
I live in District 1. Why would we try to force a recall in October of someone who is up for election in April 2013? Effort would be better spent on supporting Ms. Anglin's replacement. Recall efforts are better focused on those who just started their terms.
E. Schmidt
7:37 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I am confused now that there are two mike k s.
>>>Why would we try to force a recall in October of someone who is up for election in April 2013?<<<
A group of people in Dist. 1 made a decision to explore their options for recall and made a decision to go forward. There's no force involved. They are within their rights according to Article 9.
You don't have to participate.
K James
10:08 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Mike K,
Mrs. Anglin is not up for re-election - she has termed out.
You should also take the time to speak to your council members Pirrello and Anglin one on one. They are available by phone or email, you can get their numbers on the Ellisville,mo.us website.
Not trying to change your mind or anything, but there are two sides to this issue, and you should at least hear the other side, if this is where you are getting your information, it is pretty one sided.