Update: Ellisville Mayor Responds to Impeachment Suggestion
A resident filed a request this week to bring Ellisville Mayor Adam Paul under review of the Charter Enforcement Commission for allegedly violating the City Charter.
Updated: Feb. 12 at 10:05 a.m.
Original post:
A resident of the City of Ellisville filed a request to invoke the Charter Enforcement Commission, claiming Mayor Adam Paul violated the City Charter.
Katie James, a former Ellisville City Council member and board member of the TIF commission that reviewed a Walmart development in the city, formally filed the notice Monday. James said in her letter to the city that Paul violated the charter specifically on two occasions in which James claims Paul ordered a police officer in each incident to remove a meeting attendee from the premises. James was asked to be removed on one occasion.
James said that by doing so, Paul violated Section 3.4(c) of the city charter that reads: "Neither the Mayor nor Council Members shall give any orders to any such officer or employee, either publicly or privately."
James's letter listed the incidents as follows:
1. After meeting of the City Council occurring in early May, 2012 at the Ellisville Elementary auditorium, Mayor Paul ordered Ellisville Police Officer Kelly Murray to remove me from the Ellisville Elementary auditorium, even though the meeting was over. This can be verified by Officer Murray.
2. On February 6, 2013 Mayor Paul, during a public meeting of the City Council, ordered Chief Tom Felgate to remove a member of the public from the meeting. This can be verified by Chief Felgate, everyone present at the meeting, and the recording of the meeting.
The Charter Enforcement Commission will be comprised of three council members, Dawn Anglin, Michelle Murray and Linda Reel. City Clerk Catherine Demeter's formal notice to Paul said Paul has seven days to submit information regarding the incidents to the commission.
Update:
Paul described the events from his perspective in an email:
Katie James claimed that on two separate occasions I violated a provision of our charter by directly asking a police officer to preserve the peace and ask them to remove an insulting, threatening, and/or very much warned member of the public from a meeting to prevent further disruption. The first incident directly involving her actually took place the first day I was sworn into office in April. Katie James has made several false claims under oath by stating the incident took place in early May 2012. The only encounter I had with Katie James is my first meeting in office in mid April. The same day I was sworn into office. She rapidly approached the bench immediately following a highly contentious Ellisville Elementary council meeting regarding Walmart. She pointed her finger 4 inches from my face and started to yell at me. This is a meeting that required several additional policemen, held off site from city hall, had metal detectors at every door, and 250 upset members of the public. When she approached me she had a large bag and a device in her hand. I asked her to stop yelling and told her to show a little respect and informed her that I felt threatened. She continued so I summoned a police officer to remove Katie James from the stage. Katie James claims that I should have asked the City Manager to then instruct the police officer at the meeting to remove a person.The city manager was not present at the time and no 'panic' button was at our temporary location. Regarding the second incident, Katie James is claiming I gave 'an order' to police was just last week on the wake of the 5 year anniversary of the Kirkwood Council shootings. Katie James was not present at the meeting but thinks I should be impeached for asking our police force to protect and assist in maintaining order in our chamber.
Why this and why now? I find it odd that a Walmart TIF committee member is filing these accusations 10 months after one of the alleged incidents supposedly took place, at a time the city just issued an RFP that will consider development options requesting more TIF funds to be used for RPA2, and just before a critical election. It doesn't pass the 'smell test' for me.
Patch is tracking this story as it develops.
Caffeinated
9:48 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Katie James, you are ridiculous. Stop the nonsense.
If the council members cited proceed with any action based on the hearsay of this person, there will be repercussions.
You are all elected to do a job. Cut the BS and do it.
Caffeinated
9:59 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
The Complete text:
(c) INTERFERENCE WITH ADMINISTRATION. Except for the
purpose of inquiry, information, or investigation as established by
Article Three, Section 3.11, of this Charter, the Mayor or Council
Members shall deal with City officers and employees who are subject
to the direction and supervision of the City Manager solely through
the City Manager. Neither the Mayor nor Council Members shall
give any orders to any such officer or employee, either publicly or
privately. (Amended 11-5-02)
Key phrase: "City officers and employees who are subject
to the direction and supervision of the City Manager"
Mike K
10:06 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Key phrase in allegation #1: "even though the meeting was over."
If the meeting was over, the Mayor was acting in is position as a concerned citizen of this fine city, not as Mayor. The officer also has the leeway to refuse to accept such an unauthorized order. The officer could have told the mayor to mind his own business, but did not. Nothing to see here, move along.
Mike K
10:07 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
The officer also has a duty to maintain order, independent of the source of the request to do so, and to exercise judgement and discretion in acting on such a request.
Ellisville Shopper
10:47 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Laughable. Truly laughable.
Katie James demands impeachment of Mayor Paul over an incident she was involved in almost a year ago? She can't even get the date straight?
Was she even at the meeting on Feb. 8th? My friend who was there said she wasn't.
How much time and money will this bogus complaint waste?
If she's trying to divert attention from the upcoming election, this is a miserable failure.
If she's trying to make Mayor Paul look bad, also a miserable failure.
The guy donated $500 out of his own pocket without being asked to help the citizens who got sued along with the city by Pirrello over the recall.
I wonder who put her up to this?
E. Schmidt
6:42 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
>>>How much time and money will this bogus complaint waste?<<<
Yes. How much?
I clearly remember Katie James complaining incessantly last year about how much a recall election could cost the city last. She kept quoting all kinds of wild numbers and still never understood that it was the job of the county to give the cost figure to the city, not her job to call on the phone to "ball park" it.
So, has she "ball parked' the cost of this? Time, effort, outside legal counsel and other legal expenses to the city?
What ever it costs, Mayor Paul couldn't buy this kind of good publicity if he tried.
And the bad publicity to the proponents of TIF? Just as the next TIF project goes public with a RFP? Priceless.
This next installment of our soap opera drama is going to focus attention (like a laser beam) yet again on the big giveaway of tax dollars.
Way to go Katie...You Go Girl!
Ellisville Shopper
11:32 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Can you say:
PR Disaster? Debacle? Fiasco? Failure?
Not to mention that you have the biggest, most vocal self-avowed and self-identified racist, homophobic and class-conscious poster in all of Ellisville cheering you on AND cheering on Troy Pieper (running for re-election in Dist. 2) and Matt Pirrello (with delusions of running against Charlie Dooley for County Exec.)
THAT alone would make me want to crawl in a hole and hide.
Worse than when Pirrello tried to sue his neighbors over the recall (and they were promptly dismissed from the case by the judge.)
MIKE K
12:04 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
It's about time someone called our boy Mayor on his Gestapo style tactics. The citizens of Ellisville are finally tired of his temper tantrums where he throws pencils when he doesn't like the tenor of the discussion at the council meetings. I will commit $10,000 of my own money towards impeachment of boy George if it comes to a vote of our citizens to impeach this clown.
Ellisville Shopper
12:22 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
little mikey k,
Wow. 10k of your very own money?
Impeachment is not by popular vote of the citizens. But, then again you knew that, didn't you?
You false generosity is so very 'touching" --- and in stark contrast to the Mayor's very real generosity.
Caffeinated
1:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
It's important to understand that Katie James, Matt Pirrello, and the third stooge Charles Pavlack feel some level of ownership of Ellisville.
from http://www.stltoday.com/suburban-journals/metro/news/tif-commission-opposes-financing-for-ellisville-walmart/article_92a0debd-c3e2-52cf-8ae4-6e62679a2d67.html
"However, Katie James, a former Ellisville City Council member on the commission, was angry that the county, with the most seats on the commission, "would say no to us, when this is our town."
Matt Pirrello appointed his friends Katie James and Charles Pavlack to represent Ellisville. When Katie doesn't get her way, she stamps her feet and has a tantrum.
One wonders why she's stamping her feet now.
ellisville taxpayer
1:03 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
If you impeach Mayor Paul, you're going to have to impeach the majority of the citizens of Ellisville as we voted him in because WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF TIF! Katie, just because you are in need a a better shopping experience to purchase your cookies and face cream doesn't mean we all feel that way. Head on down Manchester Katie, about 3 miles, and you can have all the Walmart experience you want. And not on our dime!
Rockwood 25
1:18 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Not really surprised she wants impeachment, but hardly believe the accusations are worthy or the real cause. Behaving badly not just during/after a meeting but other ways as well?
Charles Pavlack
1:34 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Caffeinated, I don't know how I got drawn into this. I very purposely have not responded to any of the Ellisville posts on here (including this morning's letter to the editor which contains at least two demonstrable lies) precisely because those one side of the discussion can't seem to hold a conversation without name calling and insults.
But I guess it doesn't matter. I get called names anyway.
For the record, I was present for both of the events that Ms James mentions in her complaint, and was in fact standing right next to her when the mayor called for the officer to eject her. Both the officer and I thought he was joking at first. That's how "threatening" she was.
Caffeinated
1:49 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Drawn into it? The three of you are complicit. You, Katie, and Matt Pirrello have taken it upon yourselves to thwart the Mayor from doing his duty from day one.
I loved this bit of melodrama: http://ballwin-ellisville.patch.com/articles/pavlack-ellisville-s-next-mayor-needs-gov-experience wherein you literally call out Paul. The funny thing is, you probably did more than anyone to get him elected by highlighting his opposition.
I do apologize for referring to you as the third stooge, however. I'll let others make that determination for themselves.
Michael Rhodes
10:32 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Exact same reason I have not been commenting on these issues. Grand standing, name calling, vulgar language, and insulting others (deserving or not) is far to rampant and seem to be more important than discussing the issue. On that note I do see this request as far fetched, but I was not present at either instance.
As for cost this is part of the boards responsibilities so there should be no further cost. Unless Paul sues James or James sues Paul in civil court (depending on how the commission rules) and the city has to pick up both sides legal fees like they did in the recall case.
Caffeinated
10:48 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
"Exact same reason I have not been commenting on these issues"
That, and not being a resident of Ellisville.
Michael Rhodes
11:38 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
" Caffeinated
10:48 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
"Exact same reason I have not been commenting on these issues"
That, and not being a resident of Ellisville."
See what I mean! Only took 16 minutes.
Ellisville Shopper
12:17 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Hey man, this is Fight Club.
You want a civil discussion, go talk with the Lutherans. I think they are still behaving themselves and little mikey kkk hasn't "stunk up the joint" over there --- yet.
Caffeinated
12:20 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I'm sorry, was pointing out that you're not even a resident of Ellisville in some way uncivil?
I think it helps to qualify your opinion and thus adds to the discussion.
Michael Rhodes
12:36 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
@ES: Now that is funny as I am Luthren (non practicing as I married a Catholic).
@Caffeinated: I have never stated I lived in Ellisville and do not use an alias making my location difficult (although not impossible) to determine. For all I know you may not be an Ellisville resident or even live in the area. How does that qualify my or your opinions?
Caffeinated
12:55 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
You have stated you are a Ballwin resident before on Patch. I take you at your word.
As to whether the opinion of a non-resident on the internal affairs of Ellisville government is pertinent or not should be in the eye of the beholder. I don't personally put much weight into the opinion of non-residents regarding whether Ellisville taxpayers should help foot the bill for private developers. Nor do I value your non-resident opinion on the merits of Katie James' complaint. Others may, and certainly you have the freedom to express your opinion. I also have the freedom to point out you're not even an Ellisville resident.
Again, is that uncivil? I am capable of demonstrating a lack of civility if you'd like an example.
Michael Rhodes
1:31 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
@Caffeinated: " I am capable of demonstrating a lack of civility if you'd like an example."
Why do you feel the need? Is it because you use an alias and feel no need to be respectful of others?
@Ellisville Shopper: You are right, this is fight club and the reason I stopped posting. If many more business leave you may have to change your name to Ex Ellisville Shopper. Gone are Best Buy, Ginghams, Long John Silvers, and now Blockbuster. All businesses I use to visit in Ellisville (Best Buy and Blockbuster the most often).
Caffeinated
1:34 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
"Is it because you use an alias and feel no need to be respectful of others? "
The offer stands because you don't seem to understand what the word "civility" means as you've repeatedly misapplied it to me. Yet again, how have I acted uncivil to you?
Michael Rhodes
1:45 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
"The offer stands because you don't seem to understand what the word "civility" means as you've repeatedly misapplied it to me. Yet again, how have I acted uncivil to you?"
I don't recall every saying you were uncivil with me or anyone else for that matter. Although referring to Charles Pavlack as a "stooge" could be considered name calling and therefor uncivil. Can you point out where I have "repeatedly misapplied" it to you so I can apologize?
Caffeinated
1:49 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
"Exact same reason I have not been commenting on these issues. Grand standing, name calling, vulgar language, and insulting others (deserving or not) is far to rampant and seem to be more important than discussing the issue."
followed by quoting me and adding the following:
"See what I mean! Only took 16 minutes."
I was awfully mean to Chuck, though. I did apologize for referring to him as the third stooge. Are you going to be OK, Michael? Should I apologize to you, too?
Ellisville Shopper
2:09 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Michael Rhodes,
I know the economy is still wretched and businesses that serve consumers directly are on the ropes because wage haven't kept pace with FED money printing. Having a TIF funded Big Chinese Vending Machine in Ellisville won't solve this. It will just put more businesses out of business. Coughing-up another TIF for a developer to bring in a bunch of franchise operations is not the answer either.
If they come on their own dime, it's a different story.
I'm changing my spending habits and shopping on line or out of the area if this is all the current regime can do with my sales tax money is give it away, wreck property values for adjacent homeowners and make their existence miserable. I live too close to one of the major arteries to think it won't happen to my area once the TIF train starts rolling and picks up steam. Even if it doesn't happen to my neighborhood, it will make traffic and congestion a nightmare.
I may become an Ex Ellisville Shopper for other reasons. Ain't gonna spend my dime in "Sansoneville."
Michael Rhodes
2:11 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I do not recall saying it was uncivil and that was not my intent. I do apologize that you Interpreted my response as you were being uncivil to me.
Why do you feel the need to apologize to me? I do not believe one is needed. Thank you for asking though.
Caffeinated
2:15 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
"Why do you feel the need to apologize to me? I do not believe one is needed. Thank you for asking though."
See? I can even be gracious. You're welcome.
Michael Rhodes
2:35 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
@ES: Guess I should be gald that I am still a brick and morter shopper. Even when I shop online it has been with store pickup so I still pay the tax in (or near) my community. I am on the other side of the Walmart issue (you can read my many other posts for more about that) and I do respect your right to shop elswhere if/when it is built. It has been said before that you can and should vote with your dollars. I do not see the doom and glow of the Walmart/TIF nor do I see all roses either. Let's hope they don't decided to expand MetroLink again and actually run it though your (or/and my) back yard! hard to stop those trains once they get going.
Ellisville Shopper
7:09 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I'd rather have a MetroLink train running near by my backyard than a Walmart with the 24/7 lights, late night and early morning delivery noise, undesirables prowling the parking lot, petty crime, trash, rats from the dumpsters, ETC
An actual train would ease congestion on Manchester-Clarkson-Clayton, take cars off the road, not put more on the road and give us cleaner air.
Charles Pavlack
2:47 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I did "call out" the candidate. Last I checked, I'm entitled to my opinion.
Since he's been mayor, I haven't done anything to "thwart" him. In fact, he and I have had a number of productive -- if short -- conversations following meetings. He's even adopted a few of my suggestions. I believe he should be the best mayor he can, and have offered him my help whenever he wants it.
Mayor Paul and I have differing opinions on a number of things. We actually agree on a number of things, and I suspect we're actually closer politically on an "outside Ellisville" scale than I am with a number of the council members that I'm (admittedly) friends with.
But I have been very careful to try NOT to air those feelings since the election. In fact, in private conversations, I have urged people to work with him. That doesn't mean automatically endorsing everything he supports, but it means working together when possible, and respectfully disagreeing when it's not possible. Unfortunately, in many instances, that hasn't been done. But again, I think that both sides are guilty of that as well.
I think there's blame to go around on BOTH sides regarding why the tenor of politics in Ellisville has gotten to where it has. We had some very contentious discussions when I was on the council, especially with regard to the new Public Works site. It got very heated between council members, and between members of the council and residents of Wildwood, but it never approached this.
Caffeinated
6:07 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
>>"I did "call out" the candidate. Last I checked, I'm entitled to my opinion"
As I am entitled to mine.
>>" In fact, he and I have had a number of productive -- if short -- conversations following meetings. He's even adopted a few of my suggestions"
I'm sure Mayor Paul takes great solace in your support. Nonetheless, this: http://ballwin-ellisville.patch.com/articles/pavlack-ellisville-s-next-mayor-needs-gov-experience
>>"But I have been very careful to try NOT to air those feelings since the election. In fact, in private conversations, I have urged people to work with him."
I don't know you personally, nor do I know Mayor Paul. I voted for Michelle Murray. However, the melodrama surrounding the TIF involves three people: You, Katie James, and Matt Pirrello. Whether writing diatribes, suing neighbors, or filing complaints (and having tantrums) the three of you are at the center of the maelstrom.
MIKE K
2:48 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
If the honorable mayor (gag/gag) is impeached where the citizens of Ellisville are allowed GO TO THE POLLS AND VOTE TO IMPEACH PAUL (that will be our slogan - impeach paulie, it has a nice ring to it), I will personally invest at least $10,000 of my own money (perhaps up to $50,000 depending on how the stock market performs) in an effort to rid our city of Mayor Paul once and for all time.
Ellisville Shopper
3:12 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
little mikey kkk,
Again with the delusion that an up or down vote on impeachment is somehow going to the electorate?
Perhaps you should click on the pdf link above and read the procedure outlined in the city code section provided. It's all right there in black and white. It also includes Katie James' whiney complaint.
For someone who worked at Mallinkrodt for 30 years and managed "$50 million business," you sure don't bother to do your homework even when it's right in front of you, now do you?
Take your 10K or 50K and donate it to a worthy cause. I'm sure there is a non-profit that fosters racial understanding, supports gay rights or helps the impoverished that you can get behind.
Is there anyone or any group you don't despise? Crippled children? The blind?
PrincetonK
5:43 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Sweetheart I hardly think you have that kind of money to spend impeaching a mayor, and if you do, and spend it on something such as this than your judgement should be taken into account. Really the bottom line is that you really want to shop for $5 jeans closer to home and you just don't like that he has a different view. This also supports an argument that you do not have that kind of money to just be throwing it around. the rich don't stay, or become rich by wasting money.Maybe rather than stamping your feet and crying, put your imaginary money into a charity and make the world a better place rather than frivolously spending it to support frivolous accusations which claim to prove that mayor Paul should be impeached. Everything you write is annoying. Get over yourself. The citizens of ellisville elected him and if you had a problem with it you should have spent money at the time of the election, supporting the opposition
MIKE K
8:21 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I not really suprised you think I want a Walmart in Ellisville because of low prices. I have made my money and lots of it so I shop at Dierbergs, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrum, etc. for my needs. As a local resident since 1982, I care deeply about Ellisville and the deteriorating state of our local community. Do you realize that once Famous Brand Shoes departs, we will have virtually no viable business at all at the southeast or southwest corners of Manchester and Clarkson Roads. We have become the East St. Louis of West County and our boy Mayor has zero ideas or plans to reverse this trend. We need Walmart to turn this city around, end of story. As far as my personal financial situation, it is none of your business as to how I elect to spend my money. Fortunately that is one of the few rights our government has yet to take away from us.
Concerned Ellisville Citizen
3:21 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I cant' believe that any one would ever take Katie James seriously!! She just likes to be in the limelight. Mayor Paul has been doing an excellent job, because he is THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE!! He hears all of us and knows we do NOT WANT a Walmart in Ellisville. Katie, find something else to do, please, an leave the city of Ellisville alone!!
MIKE K
4:29 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
you go Katie, don't let the trolls discourage you
Dirk Diggler
4:32 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
So help me out. Is Katie hot enough to make a pass at or is she a bridge troll? Inquiring minds want to know.
Amy Samuel
5:59 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Katie the Clown! What Pirrello is asking more for his services he provides you with, and now you are willing to make claims that could turn into legal charges for you? Hope Pirrello and his 'services' are worth it.
As for the city, people keep bringing up the mayor and our slow progress around town, why? The mayor has ZERO to do with the businesses coming in and going out it is Kevin Bookout. As I stated on another newsfeed, the reason there has been an eyesore for years is because we don't have anyone to manage the city properly. GET A NEW CITY MANAGER! The mayor has nothing to do with the businesses coming and going, that is a direct reflection Kevin Bookout's job. He gets paid over 100,000 and was trying to increase is severance because actually working for his money is a foreign idea to him. Kevin and his little sidekick Ada Hood need to realize they are failing and single-handedly destroying an entire city.
Mayor Paul and the council do have control over who is managing and planning the city. They can make changes there and I feel if they don't get rid of Kevin Bookout and Ada Hood, none of them are doing their job in representing us all. I know everyone has an issue with the way the appearance of the city for YEARS....well, the blame is placed directly on the person managing it, Kevin Bookout must go!!
Mary Anthes-Bartlow
7:44 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Tell it, Amy!
MIKE K
8:53 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Pass the buck, the great American pasttime. The Mayor heads the city. He is responsible for the direction of the city and has done a miserable job. What is his proposal for development of the Manchester/Clarkson eyesore? He has none because he is way over his head. He has no business experience, has no clue how to interact with potential business leaders and frankly does not appear to have any interest in doing so. We need to rid ourselves of this amateur and get some real leadership for Ellisville.
Charles Pavlack
9:59 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
This will be my last post on this thread, so have at me. Ms Schmidt predictably brings up TIF yet again, despite the fact that the city has only just issued the RFP and, as far as I know, hasn't gotten any responses back.
The TIF language that the mayor objected to in the last meeting was included in the RFP (according to the explanation given at the meeting) simply so not to PRECLUDE it. It was no guarantee that it would be asked for nor that it would be granted.
In my opinion, given what happened on RPA1, a developer would have to be nuts to ask for it. And, given what I
Know about RPA2, I would (and plan to) speak out against TIF for that project, if it's requested. I don't think the same issues exist on RPA2 that existed for RPA1, in terms of site work and infrastructure issues.
But like I said, this is my last post on this thread.
Have fun storming the castle! :)
Dennis Broadbooks
11:08 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
@Charles Pavlack: "It would take a miracle"! ;-)
E. Schmidt
10:47 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
>>>I don't think the same issues exist on RPA2 that existed for RPA1, in terms of site work and infrastructure issues.<<<
They're different. Perhaps more expensive.
Those auto dealership service buildings are no doubt filled with asbestos from years of brake work. That is very expensive to remove and governed by federal law for starters. I think even states and counties have their own rules.
http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/owners-managers.html#renovation
Do we know what the result of the dioxin testing for the dealership lots is on RPA 1? Was there migration to RPA 2?
Did the dealership lots on RPA 2 get sprayed with dioxin before they were paved over? Are the services buildings filled with asbestos?
This could all get very expensive for RPA 2.
No TIF No Project is the likely scenario.
Amy Samuel
11:05 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
It is not pass-the-buck, it is a fact that it is the city manager's job to manage the city which he is not doing well at all. The Mayor has a great deal of business experience so that statement you made is a none issue. I know you want everyone on the newsfeed to think they are hearing something interesting and provocative from you, but they are not Mike K. All they hear is your lack of intellectual input because you have no idea about how the city works and who is accountable for what in the city. You are a joke Mike K.
KEVIN BOOKOUT GET OUT!! Stop taking our money with all of your corrupt ideas and schemes. The next job you have, learn how to do it, because you have no idea how to be a city manager. Years and years this city has invested in you and our ROI is grounds for you to be removed. Mike K thinks 'passing the buck' on to the mayor for your poor performance will glaze over the real person responsible, you Kevin Bookout. Those who hold the same title as you should be embarrassed to be associated with you because you are a horrendous representation of what a city manager should be. How much longer should a person be allowed to keep their job if they year after year underperform?
Mayor Paul and council, please represent this city and get new management and planners. They are destroying out town! Enough is enough and we all know it, Bookout must go.
MIKE K
3:56 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Amy, it's time for your medication otherwise I'm afraid your head will explode.
Mike K
5:12 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
You say this from first-hand experience.
MIKE K
6:31 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
actually mybusiness career specialized in pain managment and from the tone of your comments I would recommend you consider a large dose of acetaminophen/hydrocodone.
Ellisville Shopper
8:05 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
little mikey kkk,
Speaking of pain ---
How's that race car? What about that track incident? Is that guy OK? Did you give him some pain meds?
MIKE K
8:32 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
The fellow is doing fine, got his nose fixed so even he admits he looks better than ever. He is although banned from future SCCA events. I sold the car involved in the accident, but bought a newer model. For the uneducated (Mayor Paul), I race a Z06 corvette, not camero. A camero has normally 336 horsepower, my corvette is rated at 515 horsepower. I am looking forward to the start of the 2013 racing season at Gateway. Perhaps you would like to sponser me.
Caffeinated
9:07 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
"He is although banned from future SCCA events."
That's a lie. You're a laughingstock in the club, and certainly have no business behind the wheel. The only reason you're not asked to leave is it would break the charter of the club. Nothing worse than a dilletante with too much horsepower and too little skill.
Caffeinated
9:19 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Oh, and I can look up little mikey's "racing career" if anyone's interested. He's slow.
MIKE K
4:50 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Let's see I was super stock class champion in 2007 and 2009 and runnerup in 2008, 10 and 12. I suspended my racing in 2011 after the accident. Yep that's slow in Mr. know it all's fantasy world. By the way, the injured party having sued the SCCA and myself and having lost has indeed been banned from all future SCCA racing events.
Best to leave racing to the big boys Mr. Caffeinated before you get your feelings hurt or worse.
Caffeinated
5:04 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
LOL... you and Osborn were the only ones to show up for every event and your average times are less than the the A stock, B stock, *and* C stock.
You're slow, dude. Luckily for you, the "championship" is more an attendance prize and the only other guy who showed us much as you was Osborn (who's even slower).
As for you plowing into a trackworker, didn't you settle out of court? And I think the SCCA board will be surprised at your claims that he's been "banned." Everyone would love to get rid of you, though, big-mouth.
Caffeinated
5:09 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
...and also: so everyone knows: it's autocrossing, not "racing." He's not "racing" anyone. You drive on a closed course as fast as you can (without hitting cones or volunteer workers).
Mike Kelly (aka little mike) is so skilled that he went off-course and hit a volunteer worker resulting in a lawsuit.
MIKE K
5:19 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Our lawyers filed a summary judgement and the Plantiff's lawsuit against both myself and the SCCA were dismissed by the Federal Judge without prejudice. By the way, there is still time for you to sponser me for 2013. I have a nice spot on the ass end of my corvette where your picture would fit perfectly.
Caffeinated
5:22 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
" I have a nice spot on the ass end of my corvette where your picture would fit perfectly."
Still trying to get other men to pay attention to your ass end, little mikey? Stop torturing yourself and come on out of that closet... :)