Paul's Attorneys Say Judge Should Postpone Impeachment Because Charter is Unconstitutional

The attorneys also say the council has jurisdictional issues as they will testify against and sit in judgment of Paul. Judge Robert S. Cohen will give a ruling by noon Friday.

Attorneys for Ellisville Mayor Adam Paul asked the St. Louis County Circuit Court to stop Monday’s impeachment hearing because the Ellisville city charter is unconstitutional.

Attorney Lynette Petruska said the charter is so overbroad and vague that one of the charges against Paul is that he asked a city employee for letterhead.

The Ellisville city council has a hearing scheduled at 6 p.m. Monday at Ellisville Elementary School.

St. Louis County Circuit Court Judge Robert S. Cohen said he would have a ruling by noon Friday.

Keith Cheung, an attorney representing the city of Ellisville, said there are serious charges at stake. He also said the court has no legal standing to interfere with the council’s actions.

“They’re asking the court to step in and stop the procedure before it happens,” said John Maupin, another attorney representing the city. “But if the mayor’s impeached, they have a legal appeal (to the St. Louis County Circuit Court). There’s no irreparable harm.”

Cohen said it could depend on what happens at the impeachment hearing.

“Though he may be charged with things that you say may be so trivial as to be absurd, let’s say the things they find him guilty of actually are supportable, something a reasonable person would find objectionable, then I don’t know that you’re correct,” Cohen said.

If there is an impeachment hearing Monday, Paul’s attorney Chet Pleban said the outcome is already predetermined.

“I don’t care what the evidence is on Monday, this council will remove him from office,” Pleban said after Monday.

Pleban said some council members themselves will testify against Paul, but then will sit in judgment of the Ellisville mayor.

“They have a remedy. One day later, a new city council will be elected and an impartial body can sit in judgment of Adam Paul,” Pleban said.

Paul’s attorneys filed the motion asking the courts to block Monday’s impeachment hearing. The impeachment hearing would be one day before city council elections that could potentially alter the makeup of the council.

Paul claimed council members and city attorney Paul Martin had been looking for reasons to remove him from office because he actively opposes tax increment financing for Walmart.

Paul’s attorney Chet Pleban said documents and e-mails between city attorney Paul Martin and former mayor and city council member Matt Pirello show that they actively sought city charter violations to bring against Paul for an impeachment case.

According to Pleban, the e-mails even document that Martin and Pirello sought someone outside the city council to bring accusations

Pirello denied that he and Martin conspired to impeach Paul.

“This has been an ongoing problem for quite some time,” Pirello told Patch. “I have had several conversations about what should be done and how to handle this. There’s nothing surprising about that. It’s not some grand conspiracy.”

For more information on the Ellisville mayor impeachment hearings, see the following articles:

  • Suspended Ellisville Mayor Says Impeachment Was "Orchestrated"
  • Councilman Denies Any 'Conspiracy' in Case Against Ellisville Mayor
  • Attorney for Ellisville Mayor Says Emails Undermine Impeachment Case
  • Ellisville Residents Picket on Manchester Road to 'Support Mayor Paul'
E. Schmidt March 29, 2013 at 10:13 PM
Someone accused of a actual crime (as opposed to asking for stationary) would be entitled to more due process under the law than our duly elected Mayor is going to get on April Fool's Day. This is one sad state of affairs.
Mike K March 30, 2013 at 12:48 AM
I meant Acup. As in Rose Acup. Stupid mobile phone spell-helper to blame there. And my nickname for Ms. Reel is 'the smartest district council member', since the had the intelligence to avoid this like stink on s-it. More stupidity is up on Wed at the meeting where we taxpayers are hiring tweedle dee and tweedle dum for $200/hour each - that's $8,000 a week for Maupin and Cheung to cover the council and Martin's sitting end in the aftermath of Monday's hearing. It's looking like the Council is all in on a taxpayer funded full employment program for Paul Martin and his friends to cover for Martin's incompetent advice to the Council and Matt perrillo to proceed with this defacatory act on the Charter and the people of Allisville.
Mike K March 30, 2013 at 12:51 AM
S/Allisville/Ellisville/. Spell helper not so gooder. Must be the Bobby Kerr version I have.
E. Schmidt March 30, 2013 at 07:53 PM
BIG MIKE, The correct spelling of Ellisville is...S-A-N-S-O-N-E-V-I-L-L-E
OH MY GOD March 31, 2013 at 02:40 AM
Go to SupportMayorPaul.com and read pg 16 of 'emails #2' between Pirrello and Martin. Did they really have discussion in an attempt to impeach Mayor Paul for giving $500 of his own money to a widow, fixed income seniors, and a divorced neighbor to assist with the legal bills from the lawsuit that Matt Pirrello filed against the residents to block them from getting recalled. I just threw up in my mouth. The Mayor said the really good emails are not being released at this time. I wonder what they got. This was prefabricated.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »