Ex-Mayor Sues Over Walmart-Inspired Recall Efforts

The law suit comes from Ellisville Council Member Matt Pirrello against recall petitions for five council members based on recent decisions surrounding a potential Walmart.

Ellisville City Council Member and former mayor Matt Pirrello filed suit Aug. 27 against the City of Ellisville, five Ellisville residents and Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster.

The suit protests the "constitutionality" of Article 9 of the Ellisville City Charter, which describes the recall process for elected officials. Recent recall efforts stem from a potential Walmart development in the city and the council's approval of a TIF for the Walmart.

The city issued recall petitions, spurring the suit action according to an STLtoday article, for council members Roze Acup, Dawn Anglin, Troy Pieper, Linda Reel and Pirrello. 

Pirrello is the sole plaintiff in the case and has also issued a request for a temporary restraining order against the defendants to halt the collection of petition signatures. 

Julia Dolan, Mary Ann Dust, Sandra McGrath, Vincent McGrath and Patti Murphy are Ellisville residents named as defendants in the suit.

The suit says, "Nothing in Article 9 of the city charter requires or permits any cause to be specified for the recall of an Ellisville elected official." An attempt to add language to Article 9, requiring a "specified cause" for recall, was voted off the table earlier in August. The change would have been an addition on the Nov. 6 ballot. Pirrello was not present at the meeting.

"We are elected by the public, and the public shouldn't be disenfranchised by arbitrary, capricious actions by people who don't like the day-to-day decisions a council member makes," Pirrello said in the STLtoday article.

The suit argument is that the recall is illegal, "because the recall petition blank...does not provide for or permit the specification of cause for the removal of Ellisville's elected officials."

Additionally, the suit refers to the Missouri Constitution (Art. 7, Sect. 4) stating that "elected officials who are not subject to impeachment 'shall be subject to removal from office in the manner and for the causes provided by law.'" The claim says Ellisville's Article 9 fails to include the specified cause element.

mike k September 04, 2012 at 01:57 PM
Tomorrow is Armageddon for the anti Walmart folk. Enjoy the day.
Michael Hoff September 05, 2012 at 06:24 AM
As a long time resident of Clarkchester (15 years), I must say that sure there is on occasion a problem or two in the complex, but the landlords here take care of the problem. And as for the apartments not being updated, you are wrong on that one, they were being updated, until this Walmart deal came in, now the landlords are only taking care of emergency repairs until this city figures all this out. Why would (the landlords) want to keep dumping the money into this place, if and when in a few months they would be tearing them down. And if this does all fall through, I have been assured that they would be once again updating. This has been one of the nicest and quiet neighbourhoods I have lived, in my life.
Suzanne Gundlach September 05, 2012 at 07:45 PM
mike k September 05, 2012 at 09:09 PM
Now hopefully we can finally get some peace and quiet
Amy Samuel February 11, 2013 at 05:55 PM
Matt Pirrello is a joke! He slaps a lawsuit on the people he is suppose to represent and gets all of his legal bills paid for by the city, and once again the citizens are an afterthought. Who in their right mind elected him for 6 years? He needs to rethink his aspirations and get out of politics!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »